After more than a decade focused on repairing deficits, the UK defined benefit (DB) pensions sector finds itself in a very different place today. Many schemes are better funded, better governed and more resilient than at any point in recent memory. It is tempting, therefore, to ask whether DB pensions are finally “out of the woods”.
The DB pensions sector is highly fragmented, with 4,840 schemes according to the PPF. Notably, 80% of these schemes each have fewer than 1,000 members and together account for just 10% of the sector’s total assets, liabilities and members. This fragmentation results in duplication of costs and inefficiencies which can quietly erode value.
This context helps explain why it’s predominantly the larger schemes that are giving consideration to running on rather than buying out or consolidating with a superfund. For those with scale, strong governance and a robust sponsor covenant, running on offers control, flexibility and the ability to retain value within the scheme rather than passing it to insurers. Buyout remains the right answer for some, particularly smaller schemes facing rising costs and governance, but it is no longer seen as the default endgame for everyone.
Regulation is playing an important role in shaping this debate. Recent reforms around surplus and consolidation are broadly welcomed, but our research shows a sector waiting for clarity. Trustees are cautious by nature, and rightly so. Without clear guidance, case studies and practical frameworks, few are willing to be first movers, particularly where reputational risk and perceptions of fairness are at stake.