But, to maximize the benefits of this policy, it is crucial to balance protections for members with flexibility and simplicity.
At the recent PLSA investment conference, the Pensions Minister Torsten Bell emphasised that surplus release would only be permitted “where it is safe to do so and where trustees agree.” He added that trustees “are best placed to determine, in consultation with employers, the appropriate use of any surplus in their scheme.”
From the statements, the government has made, it seems likely that it will allow surplus release when a scheme is fully funded on a low dependency basis, rather than a buy-out basis. This basis was set by The Pensions Regulator (TPR) to be highly secure.
Setting it at this level, makes sense. Allowing surplus release only for schemes at full funding on a buy-out basis would be less attractive for most sponsors and could undermine the success of the policy, especially in the near term. A gradual release of surplus funds over time reduces the regret risk of large one-off payments and allows surplus funds to be generated and released on a more predictable and stable basis. This approach could be structured as a ‘surplus recovery plan’ to mirror the ‘deficit recovery plans’ that currently exist in the DB funding regime as part of a code that provided guidance on how to facilitate run-on and for how to safely extract surplus.
This would remove the potential for conflict between trustees and sponsors that could arise due to the subjectivity of discount rate setting, whereby, for example, sponsors may be incentivised to maximise the discount rate to extract surplus sooner and trustees, and their advisors, may be incentivised to be overly prudent.
There has been discussion about whether it is necessary to provide a 100% Pension Protection Fund (PPF) underpin to give trustees greater confidence in agreeing to release surplus. However, we believe that a flexible regime built around required funding levels and a holistic package of supporting security reflecting scheme-specific circumstances would be sufficient.