Skip to content

Our Insights

Avatar photo

Written by:

Kate Mijakowska

Read Time:

10 minutes

Published:

25 / 02 / 2025

Share Article:

Behind the Curtain: Navigating the Maze of Private Asset Fund Activities

With continued high private market allocations within UK pension schemes, the challenge of managing the ongoing investment, operational, legal, and tax related tasks is becoming more and more pressing.

Getting these things right is central to maximising value from allocations to private market funds.

One of the commonly quoted reasons for employing an OCIO or fiduciary manager is easing of governance burden, through outsourcing of business-as-usual and operational tasks to an external provider.

In our experience, the most time-intensive element of such day-to-day pension fund management relates to private asset fund investments. While there is certainly a lot of work required upon making a new allocation, this is often just the beginning.

The graphic below illustrates the sheer number of different matters that need to be addressed and managed during a life of a private markets fund:

Since private assets are often illiquid and cannot be sold easily and quickly, a newly appointed OCIO or fiduciary manager needs to ensure they can effectively deal with tasks associated with existing exposures.

This includes operational issues, as well as, importantly, forward planning which minimises risk of forced selling. The existing funds are likely to be at various stages of their lives – some still drawing capital, others mostly returning it, some undergoing restructuring, others seeking LP approval on an important change, and yet others requiring a secondary sale.

At Brightwell, we think that the cost and complexity of these aspects of the management of private assets are underappreciated. For our existing clients, we find that almost every week there is a matter that requires a decision, signature or some operational action from our side.

Secondary sale opportunities, when pursued, can be labour-intensive projects in themselves. And even if there are no tasks stemming from private funds, we might need to plan for portfolio rebalancing in case liquid assets become volatile.

These activities may not be as glamorous or exciting as appointing new managers and funds, or designing strategy, but they are central to maximising value from these investments. This is why pension schemes selecting their fiduciary or OCIO manager should pay particular attention to how well their prospective providers are set up to handle these issues, and how incentivised they are to do a good job.

How do we navigate the private assets maze at Brightwell?

We believe that we are uniquely positioned to take this governance burden off pension schemes.

Our heritage is the management of pension scheme investments, which means that we have been set up specifically to ensure effective management of a large, and complex book of assets and funds across multiple asset managers.

Here are some key reasons why we think Brightwell has a particular strength in this area:

1) Specialist resource working together. We have specialist teams across investments, operations, legal and tax, all working together, not only in the same firm but on the same office floor and share a common goal. Consequently, we discuss, agree and action tasks quickly and collaboratively, ensuring that our decisions are coherent from these various perspectives.

Our investment team does not simply “hand over” operational, legal, or structuring matters to other teams. Instead, we seek to leverage specialist internal resource to gain a deep understanding of issues at hand and take responsibility for ensuring that the task is dealt with, with the client’s best interest in mind, and within an appropriate time frame. This integrated end-to-end multi-functional approach reduces costs and produces better, more integrated, outcomes.

2) Experience. We have decades of experience managing assets under this model, and therefore we are highly familiar with common approvals or changes required during the life of a typical private assets fund. We have been uniquely exposed to some of the most complex issues a pension scheme can encounter working for both a multi-billion, and a sub-£1bn scheme.

3) Proactive approach. We see the negotiation of legal terms, structuring and operations as opportunities for value add. For instance, we have typically taken an LPAC seat (>20 funds at present), playing an active part in ensuring that LP interests are well represented. We have also sold private exposures in secondary markets proactively to lock in the desired level of return, rather than simply in response to liquidity constraints. We have found that being a proactive seller can make a material difference to the exit price. We have also restructured a number of mandates, where it was beneficial to do so, including buying out a small investor to enable a more custom mandate design, or restructuring of an infrastructure fund to improve fund terms and liquidity.

4) Cost conscious by nature. Our roots in managing pension scheme investments have ingrained in us a culture of cost-consciousness. We are acutely aware of significant impact that seemingly small cost savings can have on long-term outcomes, particularly in private assets where fees and expenses can quickly erode returns. Whether negotiating fund terms, optimising legal and operational expenses, or managing secondary sales, we approach every decision with a strong focus on ensuring value for money for our clients. By maintaining this discipline, we believe we can help schemes achieve their financial objectives without unnecessary cost leakage.

The combination of these four key factors thoroughly equips Brightwell in negotiating terms, playing an active role in structuring and managing assets and their cash flows up to the end of the life of a fund, across the private assets universe.

We know that navigating this maze is a challenge shared across many pension schemes.

We are here to help make it out the other side.

If you’d like to know more about Brightwell, get in touch at: hello@brightwellpensions.com

Glossary

LPA stands for Limited Partner Agreement – a document that outlines the terms and conditions of a limited partnership, including the roles and responsibilities of the general and limited partners, the distribution of profits and losses, and the management structure of the partnership.

LPAC is a Limited Partner Advisory Committee – a group of selected limited partners in a fund that serves to address key issues such as conflicts of interest, material changes to the governing documents, or valuation methodologies.

SPV is a Special Purpose Vehicle – is a distinct legal entity established by a company to isolate risk. It has its own assets, liabilities, and legal status.

Disclaimer:

The information provided was correct as at 25 February 2025 and BTPSM trading as Brightwell shall be under no obligation to notify you of any changes to the information or otherwise to update the information after this date. It is intended for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer, recommendation or solicitation to buy securities or derivatives products. Any reliance you place on this information is at your own risk.

This article does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment, nor does it constitute an offer to provide any products or services that are capable of acceptance to form a contract. Brightwell accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this material or reliance on the information contained herein. However, this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not be lawfully disclaimed.

The investment strategies that BTPSM trading as Brightwell use are subject to normal market fluctuations and the risks associated with investing in international securities markets. Therefore, the value of investments and the income from it may rise as well as fall and investors may not get back the amount they originally invested.


Avatar photo

Written by:

Kate Mijakowska

Read Time:

10 minutes

Published:

25 / 02 / 2025

Share Article:


Explore other insights

DB Pension Scheme convergence with buy-out model

The forthcoming Pension Schemes Bill is likely to contain legislation to make it easier for defined benefit pension scheme surplus to be returned to sponsors. The Government believes employers can use these funds “to increase the productivity of their businesses – to boost wages and drive growth or unlock more money for pension scheme members.” The question now is what is the right model for running on a pension scheme with surplus extraction as an option?

Find out more about “DB Pension Scheme convergence with buy-out model”

13 minute read

What does the revolving door of Pensions Ministers mean for pensions policy?

By its very nature, pensions policy needs to be long-term and consistent in order to deliver. Unfortunately, governments are quite often much more short-termist in their thinking, driven predominantly by electoral cycles. While there have been some notable successes – automatic enrolment (AE) being the main one - in recent years pensions policy appears to have hit the buffers and the high turnover of Pensions Ministers doesn’t help.

Find out more about “What does the revolving door of Pensions Ministers mean for pensions policy?”

5 minute read

Subscribe

    Email subscription form